Evidence Questioned

 However, we did manage to get enough DNA and some solid species detections. We detected Eastern Gray Squirrels and Common Pheasant and also various large mammals like Roe Deer, Wild Boar, European Badger and Homo Sapiens (Humans) that could have left the tracks

But we also classified some DNA sequences to the family Hominidae, the taxonomic group to which Humans belong and Cercopithecidae, the family of Old World Apes. Those last two classifications obviously trigger some speculation."

Sadly, it's impossible to use DNA to identify Bigfoot for certain. Vanessa Luis, Chief Molecular Scientist at the GBC, explained: "It is not actually possible to identify Bigfoot via E-DNA without a previous reference in the genetic databases. For that, one needs to have a tissue sample to extract DNA from to then barcode. Unfortunately, no confirmed DNA sequence of Bigfoot exists in the barcode reference databases we use at SGS

In recent evidence studied concerning possible DNA of a certain subject it found the usual suspects of human and forest animals ,yes it did say it found some evidence of ancient man but I would get too excited by that news as I believe most forest type areas would probably have a similar result due to the nature of man mainly living in areas easy access to food and water, check history of area where possible.if a report says subject looked for could not be found as it had to have something to compare with it can not be praised as best evidence found or used as proof of existence of said subject,as i was taught by someone who told me always question, but this seems only true when it ruffled feathers of others

."